Kingston A2000 NVMe SSD: Fast and cheap, at 10 cents per gigabyte - williamsspirly

Capital of Jamaica

At a Glance

Expert's Military rank

Pros

Effective everyday performance
Astonishingly affordable

Cons

Long writes slow to 500MBps

Our Verdict

Kingston's A2000 is a realistic bargain. It's plenty prompt enough for the mean exploiter, and what little you lose in performance you'll likely never notice.

Best Prices Now

$97.99

Free

As out headline trumpets, the big news present is a original low in NVMe SSD prices, at 10 cents per gigabyte. The sink comes courtesy of Kingston's New A2000, which as wel offers surprisingly good performance the vast majority of the time.

Design and features

The A2000 is a 2280 (22 mm wide, 80 mm long) M.2, PCIe 3.0 x4, NVMe SSD, that's available in 250GB (currently , 500GB (currently $60 on AmazonRemove not-product link) and 1TB (presently $100 on Amazon) capacities. I must admit I did a reduplicate-take when I saw those prices, as they're considerably lower than those of the Addlink S70, which itself set a price record only a month roughly ago. Commodity items ultimately! Generally: 1TB seems to be the sweet-flavored spot in terms per GB these days. At the time of this writing, larger capacity 2TB/4TB SSDs, SATA or NVMe, were silence in the 20-cent-per-gigabyte pasture.

The A2000s use a Silicon Motion (SMI) 2263 controller and 96-layer Tender loving care NAND. The NAND is all on one side of the board, making it thin adequate for most whatsoever laptop. Caching is done by treating the TLC every bit SLC, or one-morsel NAND. Written material a solitary routine is far faster than composition three.

Kingston offers a overnice five-year warranty on the A2000, and the TBW (TeraBytes that may equal Written) rating is par for this Mary Leontyne Pric range: 150TB per 250GB of capacity. That's probably more than the average user will write out in 10 years. TBW ratings are generally accustomed give a company an out just in case someone decides to use a consumer drive like the A2000 in a high-transaction server.

Execution

As I said up top, the A2000 is a ample performer, if non quite along a par with the fastest drives out there. I tested the 1TB version, and Kingston rates the 500GB for the same 2.1GBps write performance. However, because it has fewer chips to pen across, the 250GB version is rated to publish at only 1,100MBps maximum.

a2000 cdm 6 — Though it put up't fit the powerful Samsung 970 Pro, the A2000 is still easily fast enough for the moderate user.

The 1TB adaptation doesn't retard during somewhat long writes, as evidenced by our 48GB unique file cabinet write test. It did, nevertheless, adagio behind to just low 500MBps during the 450GB indite test. During the first run, that occurred later on writing virtually 50GB of data, but in two subsequent runs write speeds didn't drib to 500MBps until the approximately 150GB mark.

a2000 third slowdown later after format — This was the minute run of our 450GB pen test. The A2000 slowed down much originally on the first run. The inconsistency at the beginning is likely cod to the drive adjusting the amount of cache.

With the smart caching vendors consumption these days, it's in all probability that more TLC was treated as SLC in the latter runs. Note that SLC cache tends to glucinium allotted in proportion to the total capacity of the effort, so information technology's a expert wager that the 500GB and 250GB versions will drop to 500MBps well sooner.

48gb a2000 — Add all the tests up and the A2000 was 50 seconds off the pace, but considering it cost a mere $100, that's livable.

The event is that you'll have to deal with mere SATA speeds on those rarified occasions when you publish a large quantity of data to the campaign. That mightiness let in an initial cloning, but by and immense I'll present the drive a pass because of the relative rarity of the phenomenon.

a2000 as ssd — Eastern Samoa SSD didn't rate the A2000 A highly as CrystalDiskMark 6 did, just while those numbers look bad for the drive, in real aliveness you'd be hard-pressed to tell the difference.

The A2000 is indeed slower than more than of the competitor, but not enough slower to worry about. Flying the Windows 10 OS off of it instead of the Samsung 970 Pro I normally use… I really couldn't tell the difference. This is NVMe we're speaking about here, and the A2000 features the familiar stellar 0.02-millisecond seek times.

Conclusion

Kingston recommends its slightly pricier KC2000 for more information-intensive applications, and it is a bit quicker, especially during oblong writes. Only honestly, the A2000 is plenty fast enough for most users, and IT's superaffordable—the best deal I'm conscious of. That may change, but this is very competent M.2 NVMe SSD from Kingston at a very, very nice price.

Edited on November 30th 2019 to note that the TBW ratings are on par for the price class, not below par As was previously intimated.

Best Prices Today

$97.99

On the loose

Government note: When you purchase something after clicking links in our articles, we may earn a modest commission. Read our affiliate unite policy for more inside information.

Jon is a Juilliard-trained player, former x86/6800 programmer, and farsighted-time (late 70s) computer enthusiast support in the San Francisco Bay area. jjacobi@pcworld.com